Tea at Three
Scenario balance report
Games with no balance used/recorded: 13
Attacker wins (British/American): 4
Defender wins (German): 9
Scenario Balance Over Time
Range, where the higher the percentage, the more favourable the attacking side is. The range-width is the confidence value.
ELO vs Outcome
| Attacker ELO | Defender ELO | Expected chance to win | Date | Outcome |
|---|
| 1089 | 1109 | 47% | 2024-03-24 | Lost |
| 1260 | 980 | 83% | 2019-11-28 | Won |
| 1132 | 1105 | 54% | 2013-07-01 | Lost |
| 959 | 996 | 45% | 2013-06-30 | Lost |
| 1072 | 1132 | 41% | 2013-06-11 | Lost |
| 1023 | 989 | 55% | 2013-04-27 | Lost |
| 989 | 1023 | 45% | 2013-04-27 | Won |
| 1169 | 1159 | 51% | 2012-12-20 | Won |
| 1140 | 733 | 91% | 2012-11-13 | Won |
| 963 | 959 | 51% | 2012-10-26 | Lost |
| 1081 | 1098 | 48% | 2012-10-04 | Lost |
| 981 | 1101 | 33% | 2012-10-03 | Lost |
| 1058 | 988 | 60% | 2012-10-02 | Lost |
Attacking (4 wins) average ELOs: 1070.5 vs 1028.6 has a 55.99% of winning (if the scenario was perfectly balanced).