Tea at Three
Scenario balance report
Games with no balance used/recorded: 12
Attacker wins (British/American): 3
Defender wins (German): 9
Range, where the higher the percentage, the more favourable the attacking side is. The range-width is the confidence value.
ELO vs Outcome
| Attacker ELO | Defender ELO | Expected chance to win | Date | Outcome |
|---|
| 1031 | 1075 | 44% | 2024-03-24 | Lost |
| 1141 | 1014 | 68% | 2019-11-28 | Won |
| 1133 | 1074 | 58% | 2013-07-01 | Lost |
| 1011 | 996 | 52% | 2013-06-30 | Lost |
| 1098 | 1133 | 45% | 2013-06-11 | Lost |
| 1015 | 1131 | 34% | 2013-04-27 | Lost |
| 1131 | 1015 | 66% | 2013-04-27 | Won |
| 1074 | 1119 | 44% | 2012-12-20 | Won |
| 963 | 1011 | 43% | 2012-10-26 | Lost |
| 1083 | 982 | 64% | 2012-10-04 | Lost |
| 981 | 1098 | 34% | 2012-10-03 | Lost |
| 1056 | 995 | 59% | 2012-10-02 | Lost |
Attacking (3 wins) average ELOs: 1059.8 vs 1053.6 has a 50.89% of winning (if the scenario was perfectly balanced).